MIS LOG IN

PRR787

Summary

Title Add Non-Compliance Language to QSE Performance Standards (formerly "Add Violation Language to QSE Performance Standards")
Next Group
Next Step
Status Approved on 08/18/2009

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next steps
08/18/2009 BOARD Approved
07/09/2009 TAC Recommended for Approval Board Consideration
06/18/2009 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC Consideration
05/21/2009 PRS Recommended for Approval PRS IA Review
04/23/2009 PRS Remanded ROS Consideration
03/19/2009 PRS Referred PRS Consideration
02/19/2009 PRS Deferred/Tabled PRS Consideration
01/22/2009 PRS Referred Language review

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
08/18/2009 BOARD To approve PRR787 as recommended by TAC in the 7/9/09 TAC Recommendation Report Passed
07/09/2009 TAC To recommend approval of PRR787 as amended by the 7/8/09 ERCOT comments. Passed
06/18/2009 PRS To recommend approval of PRR787 as amended by the 6/17/09 Luminant comments and the 6/8/09 Wind Coalition comments and as revised by PRS. Passed
05/21/2009 PRS To recommend approval of PRR787 as amended by ROS comments and as revised by PRS Passed
04/23/2009 PRS To remand PRR787 to ROS Passed
03/19/2009 PRS To refer PRR787 to ROS with instruction to return to PRS in one (1) month. Passed
02/19/2009 PRS To table PRR787 until the March 19th PRS meeting Passed
01/22/2009 PRS To refer PRR787 to ROS. Passed

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Dec 3, 2008
Sponsor: International Power America
Urgent: No
Sections: 6.10.5.3, 6.10.6, 6.10.12, 6.10.12.1, 6.10.12.2, 6.10.12.3, 6.10.12.5 (new)
Description: This Protocol Revision Request (PRR) adds language to Section 6.10.5.3 which clearly defines if and when a violation of the Protocols occurs for failure to comply with performance standards. The proposed language adds clarity to Section 6.10.5.3 that is found in other Protocol Sections associated with Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) performance metrics.
Reason: The current language in the Protocols does not specify when a violation actually occurs. It was the original intent of PRR525, SCE Performance and Monitoring, and subsequent QSE performance standards to enact sanctions on QSEs failing to meet monthly performance standards and that a violation of the Protocols is reserved for a QSE’s continued failure to comply or if non-compliance to the performance standards appears to have extreme reliability consequences. Language in Section 6.10.5.3 needs to be expanded to encompass exactly when a violation of the ERCOT Protocols occurs.

Key Documents

Related Content