MIS LOG IN

NPRR045

Summary

Title: Wind Power Forecasting
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Approved on 10/16/2007
Effective Dates:
12/01/2010

or per the Nodal Protocol Transition Plan http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/protocols (11/01/07 Nodal Protocols Library)

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
10/16/2007 BOARD Approved
10/05/2007 TAC Recommended for Approval Board consideration
09/20/2007 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC consideration
08/23/2007 PRS Recommended for Approval Impact Analysis review
07/25/2007 TPTF Recommended for Approval PRS review
03/22/2007 PRS Referred TPTF Review

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
10/16/2007 BOARD To approve NPRR045 as recommended by TAC. Passed
10/05/2007 TAC To recommend approval of NPRR045 as recommended by PRS. Passed
09/20/2007 PRS On 9/20/07, PRS voted to forward NPRR045 and its IA to TAC. There was one abstention from the Consumer Market Segment. All Market Segments were present for the vote. Passed
08/23/2007 PRS To recommend approval of NPRR045 as revised by PRS. Passed
07/25/2007 TPTF To recommend approval of NPRR045 as it had been submitted to PRS Passed
03/22/2007 PRS To refer to TPTF for review. Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Feb 23, 2007
Sponsor: The Wind Coalition
Urgent: No
Sections: 2.1, 4.2.2
Description: 1. Add definitions for terms used in more than one section2. Describe the process for developing the 80% confidence level forecast for wind-power generators
Reason: Discussions in the TPTF pursuant to development of the Requirements document for wind-power forecasting made it clear that there was a disagreement on how to produce the 80% confidence level forecast for each individual wind-power resource. Discussion resulted in general agreement that a "top down" approach had merit, pending the development and review of detailed protocol changes.

Key Documents

Related Content