MIS LOG IN

NPRR711

Summary

Title: Increase the Interval Data Recorder Meter Mandatory Install Requirement from 700 kW/kVA to 1.5 MW/MVA
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Withdrawn

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
10/15/2015 PRS Deferred/Tabled Language Consideration
09/10/2015 PRS Deferred/Tabled Language Consideration
08/13/2015 PRS Deferred/Tabled Language Consideration
07/16/2015 PRS Deferred/Tabled Language Consideration

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
10/15/2015 PRS To table NPRR711. Passed
09/10/2015 PRS To table NPRR711 for one month. Passed
08/13/2015 PRS To table NPRR711 for one month. Passed
07/16/2015 PRS To table NPRR711 for one month. Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.

Background

Status: Withdrawn
Date Posted: Jun 3, 2015
Sponsor: Kathy Scott on behalf of the IDR Meter Protocol Requirement Threshold Workshop
Urgent: No
Sections: 18.6.1
Description: This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) increases the Interval Data Recorder (IDR) Meter mandatory installation requirement from 700 kW/kVA to 1.5 MW/MVA. In stakeholder discussions during the joint RMS/COPS IDR Meter Protocol Requirement Threshold Workshops, there were concerns expressed regarding the elimination of the mandatory IDR Meter threshold. These concerns included: unknown and known impacts to Transmission and/or Distribution Service Providers (TSDPs) based upon their current Tariff concerning the application and invoicing of 4CP, unknown impacts to current 4CP Demand response volumes; and impacts to ERCOT’s Load forecasting processes unless these Loads were identified by a new profile assignment. Task Force participants indicated a desire that new profile codes not be introduced due to the cost impacts to their organizations resulting from IT development, testing, and implementation of multiple new Load Profiles when that may not be the best use of budget dollars. Additional concerns related to establishing a separate threshold for the evaluation of non-IDR Metered Premises and Advanced Metering System (AMS) Metered Premises. There was concern that language would be confusing to manage; recognition that the majority of Premises have AMS Meters and the subset of non-IDR Metered Premises are very limited; and understanding and willingness during IDR Required Threshold Workshop V to have any non-IDR with a Demand up to 1.5 MW/MVA settled on a Load Profile.
Reason: Market efficiencies or enhancements

Key Documents

Related Content