MIS LOG IN

NPRR421

Summary

Title: Clarification of RMR Notifications
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Approved on 04/17/2012
Effective Dates:
05/01/2012

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
04/17/2012 BOARD Approved
03/01/2012 TAC Recommended for Approval ERCOT Board consideration of NPRR421
02/02/2012 TAC Deferred/Tabled TAC consideration of NPRR421
01/09/2012 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC consideration of NPRR421
12/15/2011 PRS Deferred/Tabled PRS Impact Analysis review
11/17/2011 PRS Recommended for Approval PRS Impact Analysis review

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
04/17/2012 BOARD To approve NPRR421 as recommended by TAC in the 3/1/12 TAC Report. Passed
03/01/2012 TAC To recommend approval of NPRR421 as recommended by PRS in the 1/9/12 PRS Report and as amended by the 2/23/12 ERCOT-Edison Mission comments. Passed
02/02/2012 TAC To table NPRR421 for one month. Passed
01/09/2012 PRS To endorse and forward the 11/17/11 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR421 to TAC. Passed
12/15/2011 PRS To table NPRR421. Passed
11/17/2011 PRS To recommend approval of NPRR421 as amended by the 11/9/11 Luminant Energy Company LLC comments and as revised by PRS. Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Oct 24, 2011
Sponsor: Edison Mission Marketing & Trading
Urgent: No
Sections: 2.1, 3.14.1, 3.14.1.1, 3.14.1.2, 3.14.1.3, 3.14.1.5, 3.14.1.6, 3.14.1.7, 3.14.1.8, 3.14.1.9, 22F
Description: This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) updates the Protocols to ensure that ERCOT issues Market Notices to Market Participants contemporaneously with ERCOT’s activities with Reliability Must-Run (RMR) Unit and Must-Run Alternative (MRA) Resource owners.
Reason: Presently there is an information gap for non-RMR Entities which can impact business strategies for bilateral energy contracts, Congestion Revenue Rights (CRRs), and participation in the Day-Ahead Market (DAM). The asymmetrical information provision under the existing Protocols provides potential advantage to some Entities and potential disadvantage to others.

Key Documents

Related Content