Title: Section 9.9.1, Invoice Recipient Payment to ERCOT for the CRR Auction, Clean-up
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Approved on 11/17/2008
Effective Dates:

or per the Nodal Protocol Transition Plan http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/protocols (12/01/08 Nodal Protocols Library)


Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
08/21/2008 PRS Referred TPTF Review
09/24/2008 PRS Recommended for Approval Impact Analysis Review
11/06/2008 TAC Recommended for Approval Board consideration
10/23/2008 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC consideration
11/17/2008 BOARD Approved

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
08/21/2008 PRS To refer NPRR143 to the Transition Plan Task Force (TPTF) for consideration. Passed
09/24/2008 PRS To recommend approval of NPRR143 as submitted. Passed
11/06/2008 TAC To recommend approval as recommended by PRS. Passed
10/23/2008 PRS To endorse and forward the PRS Recommendation Report and Impact Analysis to TAC. Passed
11/17/2008 BOARD Approved NPRR143 as recommended by TAC Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.


Status: Approved
Date Posted: Jul 25, 2008
Sponsor: ERCOT
Urgent: No
Sections: 9.9.1
Description: This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) corrects conflicting language in Section 9.9.1 and Section, Declaration of Forfeit of CRRs, by removing language regarding forfeiture of Congestion Revenue Rights (CRRs) from Section 9.9.1.
Reason: On July 17, 2007, the ERCOT Board approved two NPRRs (NPRR047, Credit Monitoring -- ERCOT Staff Clarifications, and NPRR075, Section-9, Settlements Clean-up) which both modified language in Section 9.9.1. NPRR047 recommended removing language regarding forfeiture of CRRs while NPRR075 proposed clean-up to the baseline language at the time. The recommended deletions in NPRR047 should have prevailed to prevent conflicting language between Sections 9.9.1 and This NPRR corrects the resulting conflicting language.

Key Documents

Related Content