- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
NPRR1074
Summary
| Title: | “mp” Definition Revision |
|---|---|
| Next Group: | |
| Next Step: | |
| Status: | Approved on 06/08/2021 |
| Effective Dates: |
06/09/2021
|
Action
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2021 | BOARD | Approved | |
| 05/26/2021 | TAC | Recommended for Approval | Board for consideration |
| 04/28/2021 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | TAC for consideration |
| 04/15/2021 | PRS | Recommended for Approval | TAC for consideration |
Voting Record
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2021 | BOARD | To approve NPRR1074 as recommended by TAC in the 5/26/21 TAC Report | Passed |
| 05/26/2021 | TAC | To recommend approval of NPRR1074 as recommended by PRS in the 4/15/21 PRS Report as amended by the 4/21/21 ERCOT comments, and the Impact Analysis for NPRR1074, with a recommended effective date of upon ERCOT Board approval | Passed |
| 04/28/2021 | TAC | To table NPRR1074 | Passed |
| 04/15/2021 | PRS | To grant NPRR1074 Urgent status; to recommend approval of NPRR1074 as submitted; and to forward to TAC NPRR1074 | Passed |
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
Background
| Status: | Approved |
|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Apr 6, 2021 |
| Sponsor: | Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. |
| Urgent: | Yes |
| Sections: | 9.19.1 |
| Description: | This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) changes the definition of “mp” in the credit default allocation calculations by changing “non-defaulting” to specify that the Market Participant has MWh activity in the reference month and is a currently-registered Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) or Congestion Revenue Right (CRR) Account Holder or voluntarily terminated its QSE or CRR Account Holder registration. |
| Reason: | The original language contemplated that only non-defaulting parties would be left to be invoiced for the default. This change notes that some Entities still exist that have defaulted and should still be assigned a share of a default. |
Key Documents
Apr 6, 2021 - docx - 56.4 KB
Apr 20, 2021 - xls - 128.5 KB
Apr 20, 2021 - docx - 57.4 KB
Apr 21, 2021 - docx - 42.2 KB
Apr 21, 2021 - docx - 28.1 KB
Apr 27, 2021 - docx - 28.8 KB
Apr 29, 2021 - xls - 130 KB
Apr 29, 2021 - docx - 58.5 KB
May 27, 2021 - xls - 131.5 KB
May 27, 2021 - docx - 60.3 KB
Jun 10, 2021 - docx - 60.3 KB