MIS LOG IN

NPRR406

Summary

Title: Clarification of the Timeline for Calculating the Value of X at Minimum Energy Level
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Approved on 12/12/2011
Effective Dates:
01/01/2012

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
12/12/2011 BOARD Approved
11/03/2011 TAC Recommended for Approval ERCOT Board consideration of NPRR406
10/20/2011 PRS Recommended for Approval TAC consideration of NPRR406
09/22/2011 PRS Recommended for Approval PRS Impact Analysis review

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
12/12/2011 BOARD To approve NPRR406 as recommended by TAC in the 11/3/11 TAC Report. Passed
11/03/2011 TAC To recommend approval of NPRR406 as recommended by PRS in the 10/20/11 PRS Report. Passed
10/20/2011 PRS To endorse and forward the 9/22/11 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR406 to TAC. Passed
09/22/2011 PRS To recommend approval of NPRR406 as submitted. Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Sep 2, 2011
Sponsor: ERCOT
Urgent: No
Sections: 5.6.1.2
Description: This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) clarifies that the effective date for the value of X as applied to fuel at the minimum energy level is described in the Verifiable Cost Manual. This clarification is consistent with paragraph (a) of Section 5.6.1.1, Verifiable Startup Costs, which also contains language that references the Verifiable Cost Manual for the effective date of the value of X.
Reason: NPRR305, Timeline for Calculating the Value of X, revised paragraph (a) of Section 5.6.1.1 to clarify that the effective date for the value of X is described in the Verifiable Cost Manual. However, similar changes to paragraph (2) of Section 5.6.1.2 were unintentionally omitted. This NPRR ensures consistency between these two provisions.

Key Documents

Related Content