- Home
- Market Rules
- Issues
PRR476
Summary
Title | Ramp Rate Adherence During Local Congestion |
---|---|
Next Group | |
Next Step | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Action
Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|
08/03/2006 | TAC | Approved | |
07/20/2006 | PRS | ||
06/21/2006 | WMS | Referred | Consideration of request for withdrawal. |
Voting Record
Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result |
---|---|---|---|
08/03/2006 | TAC | Endorse request for withdrawel of PRR467 | Passed |
07/20/2006 | PRS | Voted to recommend granting the request for withdrawal of PRR476. | Passed |
06/21/2006 | WMS |
Background
Status: | Withdrawn |
---|---|
Date Posted: | Nov 13, 2003 |
Sponsor: | Exelon |
Urgent: | Yes |
Sections: | 6.7.1.2, 6.10.7 |
Description: | Currently, the ramp rates on individual resources are ignored during Local Congestion. This leads to Dispatch Instructions that are impossible to adhere to, especially when every unit running for a QSE is getting a unit specific instruction. Although a QSE may ignore category 4 instructions, they must still follow the category 1. In the event that every unit running for a QSE in a zone is getting a category 4, they all make up the category 1. As a result of the ramp rates being violated, SCE cannot be followed, which puts a strain on frequency which leads to regulation and balancing instructions. Further, the QSE can potentially be penalized with imbalance charges for not keeping SCE at 0. |
Reason: |
Key Documents
Jul 11, 2006 - doc - 36 KB
Jul 25, 2006 - doc - 84.5 KB
Aug 7, 2006 - doc - 86 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 64 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 45 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 45.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 84.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 67.5 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - doc - 86 KB
Sep 2, 2004 - xls - 44 KB