MIS LOG IN

NPRR802

Summary

Title: Settlements Clean-up
Next Group:
Next Step:
Status: Approved on 04/04/2017
Effective Dates:
05/01/2017

Action

Date Gov Body Action Taken Next Steps
04/04/2017 BOARD Approved
03/23/2017 TAC Recommended for Approval Revision Request Consideration
02/09/2017 PRS Recommended for Approval Revision Request Consideration
01/19/2017 PRS Recommended for Approval Impact Analysis Consideration
10/13/2016 PRS Deferred/Tabled Language Consideration

Voting Record

Date Gov Body Motion Result
04/04/2017 BOARD Approved NPRR802 as recommended by TAC in the 3/23/17 TAC Report. Passed
03/23/2017 TAC To recommend approval of NPRR802 as recommended by PRS in the 2/9/17 PRS Report. Passed
02/09/2017 PRS To endorse and forward to TAC the 1/19/17 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR802. Passed
01/19/2017 PRS To recommend approval of NPRR802 as amended by the 11/16/16 ERCOT comments. Passed
10/13/2016 PRS To table NPRR802 and refer the issue to COPS and WMS. Passed

Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.

Background

Status: Approved
Date Posted: Sep 26, 2016
Sponsor: ERCOT
Urgent: No
Sections: 6.6.5.3, 6.6.9, 6.7.5, 9.2.3, 9.5.3, 9.19
Description: The purpose of this Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) is to clarify current practices and clean up Protocol language. There are no system changes and no changes to current Settlement practices or concepts in this NPRR. This NPRR: 1. Clarifies how Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Resources that have opted out of RUC Settlement are treated in the calculation of Real-Time On-Line Reserve Capacity; 2. Codifies the methodology to be used when Base Point data has been corrupted due to issues with ERCOT’s Energy Management System (EMS); 3. Clarifies that Resources receiving Emergency Base Points are not charged for Base Point deviation during the relevant Settlement Interval(s); 4. Corrects descriptions of variables used in Ancillary Service imbalance Settlement to agree to the associated Settlement formulas; and 5. Cleans up references in Section 9, Settlement and Billing, that refer to paragraphs of Section 7.9.3.3, Shortfall Charges to CRR Owners, that have been removed from the Protocols.
Reason: Administrative

Key Documents

Related Content