| TXSETCC701 |
Add two additional SAC04 codes: MSC 039: Advanced Metering Cost Recovery Factor MSC 040: Underground facilities surcharge |
| TXSETCC702 |
TDSPs presently do not have a BGN~08 Action code to send to inform the CR that their customer has been reconnected after the TDSP has resolved the access issue with the customer. |
| TXSETCC703 |
Graybox corrections as part of Post 3.0 Implementation clean-up. |
| TXSETCC704 |
When updating the 814_03 implementation guide for TX SET 3.0, the PER~IC segment was overlooked. This segment is required if the 814_03 is associated with a Switch (814_01), Drop to AREP (814_10), or Move In (814_16). |
| TXSETCC705 |
Certain elements of the REF~5I segment are shown to be separated by element separators ("~" in the examples) as opposed to component element separators (typically "^" in the documents). |
| TXSETCC706 |
TX SET guide for 814_24 allows a Communication Number Qualifier of "EM" for Electronic Mail. This allows the submitter of the 814_24 to specify an email address as the contact type in the PER segment. |
| TXSETCC707 |
Remove Drop to AREP process references from the Implementation Guide since the 814_10 transaction and Drop to AREP functionality is no longer valid in the market, Per PUCT Subst. R. §25.482 Project 33025. |
| TXSETCC708 |
Per Terms and Conditions Task Force, modify the 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction to include a new REF segment (REF~5I) that also provides data elements to communicate: The reason for denial of access, where the reason for estimating only ap... |
| TXSETCC709 |
REF~TN does not specify that special characters are not allowed. But this segment refers back to the BGN06 of the 814_03/814_24. That segment does specify, "Transaction Reference numbers will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and digi... |
| TXSETCC710 |
Add "Not Used when NM109=NONE" to the REF~NH segment. |
| TXSETCC711 |
Transaction description on the 814_28 implementation guide needs clarification so that the market knows to whom ERCOT will forward each type of 814_28. |
| TXSETCC712 |
ERCOT needs to make a system change to only Require REF~5I (Reason for Estimate) for IDR (Interval) ESI IDs if the PTD*BO IA Net Interval Usage Summary "QTY" is equal to "KA" (Quantity Estimated), otherwise this segment would not be present... |
| TXSETCC713 |
Revise language in the gray box of 814_16 |
| TXSETCC714 |
Ts and Cs Requirement 3 modified the "Cancel Restatement" process. The Implementation guide in the 867_03 contradicts this process currently. |
| TXSETCC715 |
The guide does not specify that "NFI" reject reason is for ERCOT use only. |
| TXSETCC716 |
V3.0 adds language to the BIG05 that suggests the BIG05 is used to match invoice to invoice. The BIG05 is used to match the invoice to the usage, when applicable. Gray box needs to be updated to reflect true validation processes |
| TXSETCC718 |
Currently, it seems that ERCOT is canceling 814_24 Move-outs after receiving the 814_16 transaction for "MOVE OUT CANCELLED DUE TO AN INCOMING MOVE IN". ERCOT did not wait to receive the 814_04 transaction before sending the Non-Response dr... |
| TXSETCC719 |
In order for the defaulting REP to know that a Mass Drop that ERCOT has initiated on their behalf has been rejected by the TDSP because the TDSP has a Safety NET Request Pending for a Different CR (SNP), the SNP should be added as a valid r... |
| TXSETCC720 |
Add code A78 "Item or Service already Established (Requested action has already completed)" as a valid reject reason to the 814_29. |
| TXSETCC721 |
Clean up of grey box language that was added in TX SET 3.0 to the 814_03 and 814_14 that implies that ERCOT will use customer information in these transactions, if it is available to them, during a Mass Transition. Since the market agreed t... |
| TXSETCC722 |
IG currently requires Originating Tran ID and Estimated Restoration Date whenever purpose code = "79". It is actually only required when purpose code = 79 AND Suspension/Reactivation code = RC001. Causing false rejection of a 650_04 Reactiv... |
| TXSETCC723 |
Need to add SAC04 codes to the Muni/Coop 810_03 INV |
| TXSETCC724 |
During flight 0407, ERCOT raised the concern that it is unclear exactly when the TS code should be included on cancel transactions. This change is to clarify that the TS code should only be used when cancelling a Mass Transition Drop and sh... |
| TXSETCC725 |
Update the Implementation Guide for the 867_03 and 867_02 to show that the REF~JH~I will be used for kWh Generation values only and to state that if there are multiple REF~JH~I loops in the 867_03, that ERCOT will only read and use the firs... |
