| 674 |
Remove the BPO from the 867_02 and add applicable information back into the appropriate segment gray boxes of the guide. |
Remove the BPO from the 867_02 and add applicable information back into the appropriate segment gray boxes of the guide. |
12/08/2004 |
Tom Baum |
ERCOT |
No |
867_02 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 678 |
Update the Example on the 814_22 Implementation Guide to remove the unmetered REF~PRT segment (Unmetered Service Type) since there is already a metered segment in the same NM1 loop. Both Metered and Unmetered Services cannot be sent in the same NM1 Loop. |
Update the Example on the 814_22 Implementation Guide to remove the unmetered REF~PRT segment (Unmetered Service Type) since there is already a metered segment in the same NM1 loop. Both Metered and Unmetered Services cannot be sent in the same NM1 Loop. |
12/03/2004 |
Tom Baum |
ERCOT |
No |
814_22 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 687 |
In the MOU/EC process for establishing a CSA, ERCOT needs a way to reject any additional 814_18 establish CSA requests sent to ERCOT when there is already an 814_18 pending. ERCOT requests the addition of the reject code "NFI" to the list of acceptable codes in the 814_19 REF ~7G Reject Reason Segment. Add the reject code "NFI" to the list of acceptable reject codes in the REF02 of the 814_19 REF~7G. See Redline below. |
In the MOU/EC process for establishing a CSA, ERCOT needs a way to reject any additional 814_18 establish CSA requests sent to ERCOT when there is already an 814_18 pending. ERCOT requests the addition of the reject code "NFI" to the list of acceptable codes in the 814_19 REF ~7G Reject Reason Segment. Add the reject code "NFI" to the list of acceptable reject codes in the REF02 of the 814_19 REF~7G. See Redline below. |
03/09/2005 |
Suzette M. Wilburn |
ERCOT |
No |
814_19 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
Yes |
| 691 |
To support the changes in the revised Pro-Forma Retail Delivery Tariff, PUCT Project 29637. |
To support the changes in the revised Pro-Forma Retail Delivery Tariff, PUCT Project 29637. |
06/06/2006 |
Rob Bevill |
Green Mountain |
No |
810_02, 867_03, 820_02, 650_01, 650_02, 650_04, 814_PC |
Implemented |
3.0 |
Yes |
| 692 |
Reference TX SET Issue 019 Transactional Process for Handling CR to CR Mass Transition. |
Reference TX SET Issue 019 Transactional Process for Handling CR to CR Mass Transition. |
06/06/2006 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_02, 814_03, 814_04, 814_08, 814_09, 814_11, 814_13, 814_14, 814_15, 814, 17, 814_19, 814_25, 814_27, 814_28, 650_02 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
Yes |
| 693 |
Some TDSPs create ESI IDs using subdivision plats and at this time no TDSP equipment has been installed. These ESI IDs are create with a profile based on the assumption that each address may be residential with the intention later on being to correct the profile, if necessary, when the metering equipment is installed and energized. |
Some TDSPs create ESI IDs using subdivision plats and at this time no TDSP equipment has been installed. These ESI IDs are create with a profile based on the assumption that each address may be residential with the intention later on being to correct the profile, if necessary, when the metering equipment is installed and energized. |
07/03/2006 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 694 |
ERCOT validation is allowing only 5 or 9 digits in the customer service address zip segment. |
ERCOT validation is allowing only 5 or 9 digits in the customer service address zip segment. |
07/10/2006 |
Catherine Meiners |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01, 814_04, 814_08, 814_10, 814_12, 814_16, 814_18, 814_20, 814_24, 814_26, 814_28 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 695 |
Add a REF Status Reason segment to the 814_05 so that ERCOT can use the REF~1P to indicate to CRs that historical usage is not available from the TDSP. |
Add a REF Status Reason segment to the 814_05 so that ERCOT can use the REF~1P to indicate to CRs that historical usage is not available from the TDSP. |
07/13/2006 |
Jennifer Garcia |
Direct Energy |
No |
814_05 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 696 |
Remove BPO from 814_20 Guides. |
Remove BPO from 814_20 Guides. |
07/17/2006 |
Cary Reed |
AEP |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 697 |
Clean up of examples - 867_04 examples (2 of 5) and (3 of 5) |
Clean up of examples - 867_04 examples (2 of 5) and (3 of 5) |
07/17/2006 |
Johnny Robertson |
TXU Energy |
No |
867_04 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 698 |
Clarification on 650_01 and 650_02 |
Clarification on 650_01 and 650_02 |
06/19/2006 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 699 |
When the CR sends in the cancel if they have added a penalty for a previous billing to the original invoice (wrong invoice) and they try to cancel only the dollars for the canceled kwh, the cancel gets rejected because the amounts don't match. We do need the invoice number to match because our invoice number is the originating tran ID and that is the only way the system will know what month the CR is trying to cancel and can attach to the correct account. What we need is if the original CR invoice had a penalty attached that the cancel dollars don't have to match the original billing. |
When the CR sends in the cancel if they have added a penalty for a previous billing to the original invoice (wrong invoice) and they try to cancel only the dollars for the canceled kwh, the cancel gets rejected because the amounts don't match. We do need the invoice number to match because our invoice number is the originating tran ID and that is the only way the system will know what month the CR is trying to cancel and can attach to the correct account. What we need is if the original CR invoice had a penalty attached that the cancel dollars don't have to match the original billing. |
07/03/2006 |
Suzette M. Sondag |
EC Power |
No |
810_03 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 700 |
The Terms and Conditions Taskforce has identified a gap/issue concerning Disconnects for Non-Payment that would be scheduled to be performed on a Friday that may be outside of the 3 Business Days for DNPs to be performed by the TDSP according to their Tariff. |
The Terms and Conditions Taskforce has identified a gap/issue concerning Disconnects for Non-Payment that would be scheduled to be performed on a Friday that may be outside of the 3 Business Days for DNPs to be performed by the TDSP according to their Tariff. |
08/23/2006 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
650_01 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 701 |
Add two additional SAC04 codes: MSC 039: Advanced Metering Cost Recovery Factor MSC 040: Underground facilities surcharge |
Add two additional SAC04 codes: MSC 039: Advanced Metering Cost Recovery Factor MSC 040: Underground facilities surcharge |
08/22/2006 |
Bill Reily |
TXU Electric Delivery |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 702 |
TDSPs presently do not have a BGN~08 Action code to send to inform the CR that their customer has been reconnected after the TDSP has resolved the access issue with the customer. |
TDSPs presently do not have a BGN~08 Action code to send to inform the CR that their customer has been reconnected after the TDSP has resolved the access issue with the customer. |
08/23/2006 |
Cary Reed |
AEP |
Yes |
650_04 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 703 |
Graybox corrections as part of Post 3.0 Implementation clean-up. |
Graybox corrections as part of Post 3.0 Implementation clean-up. |
08/24/2006 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
814_04, 814_08, 814_09, 814_14, 814_15 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 704 |
When updating the 814_03 implementation guide for TX SET 3.0, the PER~IC segment was overlooked. This segment is required if the 814_03 is associated with a Switch (814_01), Drop to AREP (814_10), or Move In (814_16). |
When updating the 814_03 implementation guide for TX SET 3.0, the PER~IC segment was overlooked. This segment is required if the 814_03 is associated with a Switch (814_01), Drop to AREP (814_10), or Move In (814_16). |
01/31/2007 |
Catherine Meiners |
ERCOT |
Yes |
814_03 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 705 |
Certain elements of the REF~5I segment are shown to be separated by element separators ("~" in the examples) as opposed to component element separators (typically "^" in the documents). |
Certain elements of the REF~5I segment are shown to be separated by element separators ("~" in the examples) as opposed to component element separators (typically "^" in the documents). |
01/30/2007 |
Tammy Beaver |
EP Solutions |
No |
867_03 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 706 |
TX SET guide for 814_24 allows a Communication Number Qualifier of "EM" for Electronic Mail. This allows the submitter of the 814_24 to specify an email address as the contact type in the PER segment. |
TX SET guide for 814_24 allows a Communication Number Qualifier of "EM" for Electronic Mail. This allows the submitter of the 814_24 to specify an email address as the contact type in the PER segment. |
04/05/2007 |
Susan Munson |
ERCOT |
No |
814_24 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 707 |
Remove Drop to AREP process references from the Implementation Guide since the 814_10 transaction and Drop to AREP functionality is no longer valid in the market, Per PUCT Subst. R. §25.482 Project 33025. |
Remove Drop to AREP process references from the Implementation Guide since the 814_10 transaction and Drop to AREP functionality is no longer valid in the market, Per PUCT Subst. R. §25.482 Project 33025. |
04/25/2007 |
Susan Munson |
ERCOT |
No |
814_11 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 708 |
Per Terms and Conditions Task Force, modify the 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction to include a new REF segment (REF~5I) that also provides data elements to communicate: The reason for denial of access, where the reason for estimating only applies to the monthly usage (867_03) and not the 867_03 Final |
Per Terms and Conditions Task Force, modify the 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction to include a new REF segment (REF~5I) that also provides data elements to communicate: The reason for denial of access, where the reason for estimating only applies to the monthly usage (867_03) and not the 867_03 Final |
06/05/2007 |
Susan Munson |
ERCOT |
No |
867_03 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 709 |
REF~TN does not specify that special characters are not allowed. But this segment refers back to the BGN06 of the 814_03/814_24. That segment does specify, "Transaction Reference numbers will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and digits (0 to 9). Note that punctuation (spaces, dashes, etc.) must be excluded." |
REF~TN does not specify that special characters are not allowed. But this segment refers back to the BGN06 of the 814_03/814_24. That segment does specify, "Transaction Reference numbers will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and digits (0 to 9). Note that punctuation (spaces, dashes, etc.) must be excluded." |
06/14/2007 |
Catherine Meiners |
ERCOT |
No |
867_03 Final and 867_04 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 710 |
Add "Not Used when NM109=NONE" to the REF~NH segment. |
Add "Not Used when NM109=NONE" to the REF~NH segment. |
05/23/2007 |
Kyle Patrick |
Reliant Energy |
No |
814_14 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 711 |
Transaction description on the 814_28 implementation guide needs clarification so that the market knows to whom ERCOT will forward each type of 814_28. |
Transaction description on the 814_28 implementation guide needs clarification so that the market knows to whom ERCOT will forward each type of 814_28. |
07/06/2007 |
Catherine Meiners |
ERCOT |
No |
814_28 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 712 |
ERCOT needs to make a system change to only Require REF~5I (Reason for Estimate) for IDR (Interval) ESI IDs if the PTD*BO IA Net Interval Usage Summary "QTY" is equal to "KA" (Quantity Estimated), otherwise this segment would not be present. |
ERCOT needs to make a system change to only Require REF~5I (Reason for Estimate) for IDR (Interval) ESI IDs if the PTD*BO IA Net Interval Usage Summary "QTY" is equal to "KA" (Quantity Estimated), otherwise this segment would not be present. |
07/09/2007 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
867_03 |
Implemented |
3.0 |
No |
| 713 |
Revise language in the gray box of 814_16 |
Revise language in the gray box of 814_16 |
06/14/2007 |
Kyle Patrick |
Reliant Energy |
No |
814_16 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 714 |
Ts and Cs Requirement 3 modified the "Cancel Restatement" process. The Implementation guide in the 867_03 contradicts this process currently. |
Ts and Cs Requirement 3 modified the "Cancel Restatement" process. The Implementation guide in the 867_03 contradicts this process currently. |
07/17/2007 |
Kyle Patrick |
Reliant Energy |
No |
867_03 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 715 |
The guide does not specify that "NFI" reject reason is for ERCOT use only. |
The guide does not specify that "NFI" reject reason is for ERCOT use only. |
07/31/2007 |
Cary Reed |
AEP |
No |
814_25 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 716 |
V3.0 adds language to the BIG05 that suggests the BIG05 is used to match invoice to invoice. The BIG05 is used to match the invoice to the usage, when applicable. Gray box needs to be updated to reflect true validation processes |
V3.0 adds language to the BIG05 that suggests the BIG05 is used to match invoice to invoice. The BIG05 is used to match the invoice to the usage, when applicable. Gray box needs to be updated to reflect true validation processes |
01/10/2008 |
Suzette Sondag |
EC Power |
No |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 717 |
V3.0 added a duplicate YNQ~~Y~~~~~~9~RES segment to the 65002. |
V3.0 added a duplicate YNQ~~Y~~~~~~9~RES segment to the 65002. |
01/10/2008 |
Suzette Sondag |
EC Power |
No |
650_02 |
Withdrawn |
3.0A |
No |
| 718 |
Currently, it seems that ERCOT is canceling 814_24 Move-outs after receiving the 814_16 transaction for "MOVE OUT CANCELLED DUE TO AN INCOMING MOVE IN". ERCOT did not wait to receive the 814_04 transaction before sending the Non-Response driven Cancel. |
Currently, it seems that ERCOT is canceling 814_24 Move-outs after receiving the 814_16 transaction for "MOVE OUT CANCELLED DUE TO AN INCOMING MOVE IN". ERCOT did not wait to receive the 814_04 transaction before sending the Non-Response driven Cancel. |
02/14/2008 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_24 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 719 |
In order for the defaulting REP to know that a Mass Drop that ERCOT has initiated on their behalf has been rejected by the TDSP because the TDSP has a Safety NET Request Pending for a Different CR (SNP), the SNP should be added as a valid reject code for the 814_11 in the REF~7G |
In order for the defaulting REP to know that a Mass Drop that ERCOT has initiated on their behalf has been rejected by the TDSP because the TDSP has a Safety NET Request Pending for a Different CR (SNP), the SNP should be added as a valid reject code for the 814_11 in the REF~7G |
04/15/2008 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_11 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 720 |
Add code A78 "Item or Service already Established (Requested action has already completed)" as a valid reject reason to the 814_29. |
Add code A78 "Item or Service already Established (Requested action has already completed)" as a valid reject reason to the 814_29. |
04/15/2008 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_29 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 721 |
Clean up of grey box language that was added in TX SET 3.0 to the 814_03 and 814_14 that implies that ERCOT will use customer information in these transactions, if it is available to them, during a Mass Transition. Since the market agreed that ERCOT will not use customer information in these transactions during a Mass Transition event, we should remove all grey box language that implies that actual customer information could be used i.e. "in the absence of customer information". |
Clean up of grey box language that was added in TX SET 3.0 to the 814_03 and 814_14 that implies that ERCOT will use customer information in these transactions, if it is available to them, during a Mass Transition. Since the market agreed that ERCOT will not use customer information in these transactions during a Mass Transition event, we should remove all grey box language that implies that actual customer information could be used i.e. "in the absence of customer information". |
04/16/2008 |
Rob Bevill |
Green Mountain Energy Co. |
No |
814_03, 814_14 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 722 |
IG currently requires Originating Tran ID and Estimated Restoration Date whenever purpose code = "79". It is actually only required when purpose code = 79 AND Suspension/Reactivation code = RC001. Causing false rejection of a 650_04 Reactivate after disconnect for denial of access when Originating Transaction ID and Estimated Restoration Date is not also included. |
IG currently requires Originating Tran ID and Estimated Restoration Date whenever purpose code = "79". It is actually only required when purpose code = 79 AND Suspension/Reactivation code = RC001. Causing false rejection of a 650_04 Reactivate after disconnect for denial of access when Originating Transaction ID and Estimated Restoration Date is not also included. |
04/17/2008 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_04 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 723 |
Need to add SAC04 codes to the Muni/Coop 810_03 INV |
Need to add SAC04 codes to the Muni/Coop 810_03 INV |
03/25/2008 |
Dave Lowder |
Nueces Electric Co-op (TDSP) |
No |
810_03 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 724 |
During flight 0407, ERCOT raised the concern that it is unclear exactly when the TS code should be included on cancel transactions. This change is to clarify that the TS code should only be used when cancelling a Mass Transition Drop and should not be used for any other purpose. |
During flight 0407, ERCOT raised the concern that it is unclear exactly when the TS code should be included on cancel transactions. This change is to clarify that the TS code should only be used when cancelling a Mass Transition Drop and should not be used for any other purpose. |
04/17/2008 |
Rob Bevill |
Green Mountain Energy Company |
No |
814_08 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 725 |
Update the Implementation Guide for the 867_03 and 867_02 to show that the REF~JH~I will be used for kWh Generation values only and to state that if there are multiple REF~JH~I loops in the 867_03, that ERCOT will only read and use the first one in the transaction that is encountered. |
Update the Implementation Guide for the 867_03 and 867_02 to show that the REF~JH~I will be used for kWh Generation values only and to state that if there are multiple REF~JH~I loops in the 867_03, that ERCOT will only read and use the first one in the transaction that is encountered. |
09/30/2008 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
867_03, 867_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 726 |
Revised PUCT Subs. rule 25.181 allows for the breakout of the Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor (EECRF) from TDSPs base rates. |
Revised PUCT Subs. rule 25.181 allows for the breakout of the Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor (EECRF) from TDSPs base rates. |
10/22/2008 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 727 |
TX Set Transaction Guide should specify the reject reason RNE (Request Not Eligible) for ERCOT use only. |
TX Set Transaction Guide should specify the reject reason RNE (Request Not Eligible) for ERCOT use only. |
01/26/2009 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_25 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 728 |
The 867_03 TX SET Guide in the N1~8S segment the N106 is missing the 40 for Receiver for ERCOT Read Load transactions. |
The 867_03 TX SET Guide in the N1~8S segment the N106 is missing the 40 for Receiver for ERCOT Read Load transactions. |
08/24/2009 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
867_03 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 729 |
Remove examples from Implementation Guides and create separate documentation to allow for quicker correction and addition of new examples without a TX SET release |
Remove examples from Implementation Guides and create separate documentation to allow for quicker correction and addition of new examples without a TX SET release |
08/26/2009 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
All transactions |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 730 |
Changing the term on-cycle to reflect Standard Switch and off-cycle to reflect Self Selected Switch in all affected TX SET Guides |
Changing the term on-cycle to reflect Standard Switch and off-cycle to reflect Self Selected Switch in all affected TX SET Guides |
08/27/2009 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01, 814_02, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 731 |
Update the TX SET Guides with correct information. |
Update the TX SET Guides with correct information. |
05/06/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
ALL |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 732 |
Remove SAC04 guides from the 810_02 and 810_03 guides. A new document will be created to allow changes outside of a release. |
Remove SAC04 guides from the 810_02 and 810_03 guides. A new document will be created to allow changes outside of a release. |
05/10/2010 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
No |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 733 |
Discontinue use of the following transactions submitted to ERCOT by a CR 814_07, 814_09, 814_13, 814_15, 814_19, 814_21, 814_23, & 814_29. |
Discontinue use of the following transactions submitted to ERCOT by a CR 814_07, 814_09, 814_13, 814_15, 814_19, 814_21, 814_23, & 814_29. |
05/31/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_07, 814_15, 814_23 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 734 |
New REF Segment to the 814_20 with Switch Hold Add and Removal and new Reason for Change added to REF~TD segment to support Meter Tampering Rulemaking |
New REF Segment to the 814_20 with Switch Hold Add and Removal and new Reason for Change added to REF~TD segment to support Meter Tampering Rulemaking |
06/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 735 |
In order to support Meter Tampering, in the event of a Mass Transition, the POLR CR will be notified that an ESI ID had a Switch Hold Prior to the Mass Transition. |
In order to support Meter Tampering, in the event of a Mass Transition, the POLR CR will be notified that an ESI ID had a Switch Hold Prior to the Mass Transition. |
06/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04 and 814_14 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 736 |
In order to reject a Move In or Switch which currently has a Switch Hold, a new reject code of SHF will be added to the appropriate transactions. |
In order to reject a Move In or Switch which currently has a Switch Hold, a new reject code of SHF will be added to the appropriate transactions. |
06/17/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04 and 814_05 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 737 |
In order to support the Meter Tampering Rulemaking, changes were added to the 650_01 and 650_02 to communicate Switch Hold Disconnect and Reconnect |
In order to support the Meter Tampering Rulemaking, changes were added to the 650_01 and 650_02 to communicate Switch Hold Disconnect and Reconnect |
06/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 738 |
New Critical Care status designations are required when Critical Care = Y and additional Contact information is required for certain Critical Care status. |
PUCT Project 37622 "RULEMAKING TO AMEND CUSTOMER PROTECTION RULES RELATING TO DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL CARE CUSTOMERS" proposes new Critical Care Status designations that add new identification requirements to all affected TX SET Implementation Guides. |
06/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 739 |
Changes are required to the 814_PC in order for the TDSPs to receive customer contact information for power outages and service restoration |
Changes are required to the 814_PC in order for the TDSPs to receive customer contact information for power outages and service restoration. |
06/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_PC |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 740 |
If the 814_27 is received with REF~1P~HUU (Status Reason) HISTORICAL USAGE UNAVAILABLE, ERCOT should close the Business Process Instance (BPI) and the 867_02 transaction should not be expected by the CR or ERCOT |
If the 814_27 is received with REF~1P~HUU (Status Reason) HISTORICAL USAGE UNAVAILABLE, ERCOT should close the Business Process Instance (BPI) and the 867_02 transaction should not be expected by the CR or ERCOT |
04/06/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05 and 814_27 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 741 |
Adding a priority code to the 814_24 to allow for same day requests to be processed at a different level from standard Move Outs. |
Adding a priority code to the 814_24 to allow for same day requests to be processed at a different level from standard Move Outs. |
08/11/2010 |
Jennifer Frederick |
Direct Energy |
No |
814_03 and 814_24 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 742 |
Addition of new reject code ACR - Acquisition Cancel Reject to be used when a CR submits an 814_08 on a Acquisition |
Addition of new reject code ACR - Acquisition Cancel Reject to be used when a CR submits an 814_08 on a Acquisition |
08/13/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_09 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 743 |
Addition of new reject code CW1 for use when a CR submits an 814_08 or 814_12 within 1 day of Scheduled Meter Read |
Addition of new reject code CW1 for use when a CR submits an 814_08 or 814_12 within 1 day of Scheduled Meter Read |
08/13/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_09 and 814_13 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 744 |
Adding a Time Stamp to the BGN to assist in establishing what time the CR submitted the service request to the TDSP. |
Adding a Time Stamp to the BGN to assist in establishing what time the CR submitted the service request to the TDSP. |
08/18/2010 |
Jennifer Frederick |
Direct Energy |
No |
650_01 |
Withdrawn |
Future |
No |
| 745 |
Add the ability for a TDSP to Complete Unexecutable a Switch. |
Add the ability for a TDSP to Complete Unexecutable a Switch |
08/22/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_28 and 814_29 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 746 |
TX SET Guide changes by transaction required to support Acquisition Transfer |
TX SET Guide changes by transaction required to support Acquisition Transfer |
09/14/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_03, 814_04, 814_08, 814_09, 814_11 and 814_14 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 747 |
In order to provide REPs information on whether an ESI ID has a provisioned Advanced Meter installed at the premise, a new REF segment will be added to the 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 and 814_20 |
In order to provide REPs information on whether an ESI ID has a provisioned Advanced Meter installed at the premise, a new REF segment will be added to the 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 and 814_20. |
09/21/2010 |
Jennifer Frederick |
Direct Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 and 814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 748 |
The purpose of this Change Control is to sync the names of the Texas SET Guide transactions, with the names of the transactions in Protocol and the Retail Market Guide. |
The purpose of this Change Control is to sync the names of the Texas SET Guide transactions, with the names of the transactions in Protocol and the Retail Market Guide |
09/21/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
824, 650_02, 650_04, 650_05, 810_02, 810_03, 814_01, 814_02, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_06, 814_08, 814_09, 814_18, 814_19, 814_20, 814_21, 814_22, 814_26, 814_27, 814_29, 820_02, 820_03, 867_03, 867_04, T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 749 |
Explanation of the 2 options for the REF~IK segment in the 810_03 transaction |
Remove the requirement for an Invoice Number for SAC04 = LPC001 on the 810_03 |
09/22/2010 |
Chris Duncan |
Nueces Electric Co-Op (TDSP) |
No |
810_03 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 750 |
Add new SAC04 codes to the 810_02 transaction. |
Add new SAC04 codes to the 810_02 transaction |
09/23/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 751 |
Adding new codes Force Majeure Event (FME) and Weather Moratorium (WTM) |
Adding new codes Force Majeure Event (FME) and Weather Moratorium (WTM) |
09/29/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_02, 814_04, 814_05, 814_13, 814_14, 814_25, and 814_28 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 752 |
Remove incorrect link for locating ISO country codes from TX SET implementation Guides |
Several of the Texas SET Guides have an incorrect link for locating the ISO Country Codes. |
09/30/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01, 814_14, 814_16, 814_24 and 814_PC |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 753 |
Create a new code in both the 650_01 and 650_02 transactions that will allow a CR to notify a TDSP when a customer has installed some type of generation equipment at the premise |
Create a new code in both the 650_01 and 650_02 transactions that will allow a CR to notify a TDSP when a customer has installed some type of generation equipment at the premise |
10/04/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 754 |
Add a new code to allow a CR to notify a TDSP when a customer has an Electric Vehicle as an end-use device at a premise. |
Add a new code to allow a CR to notify a TDSP when a customer has an Electric Vehicle as an end-use device at a premise. |
10/14/2010 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 755 |
In order for the TDSP to send discretionary charges due to tampering a new type code should be added to the 810_02 |
In order for the TDSP to send discretionary charges due to tampering a new type code should be added to the 810_02 |
10/14/2010 |
Jonathan Landry |
Gexa Energy |
No |
810_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 756 |
Cleanup after 3.0A to have off-cycle updated to reflect self selected |
Cleanup after 3.0A to have off-cycle updated to reflect self selected |
10/15/2010 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_03, 814_04, 814_04 and 814_11 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 757 |
Missed 814_20 transaction left out on CC 738 - New Critical Care status designations are required when Critical Care = Y and additional Contact information is required for certain Critical Care status. |
Missed 814_20 transaction left out on CC 738 - New Critical Care status designations are required when Critical Care = Y and additional Contact information is required for certain Critical Care status |
10/18/2010 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
TNMP |
No |
814_20 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 758 |
Proposes changes to MIMO rules (Solution to Stacking), which would allow the TDSP to reject an 814_08 cancel with cancel codes of A81, MPC and MOX |
Proposes changes to MIMO rules (Solution to Stacking), which would allow the TDSP to reject an 814_08 cancel with cancel codes of A81, MPC and MOX |
10/19/2010 |
Jane Eyanson |
AEP |
No |
814_08 and 814_09 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 759 |
Add a new REF segment to the 814_16, 814_24 and 814_03 to provide key information to the TDSP about a condition that may affect the execution of a MVI, MVO or MVO to CSA |
Add a new REF segment to the 814_16, 814_24 and 814_03 to provide key information to the TDSP about a condition that may affect the execution of a MVI, MVO or MVO to CSA. |
10/20/2010 |
Johnny Robertson |
TXU Energy |
No |
814_16, 814_24 & 814_03 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 760 |
Add a new code in the ESIID attributes to specify LED bulb types for Unmetered Service type |
Add a new code in the ESIID attributes to specify LED bulb types for Unmetered Service type. |
10/21/2010 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 814_22 and 867_03 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 761 |
Add to the existing REF02 of the REF~PRT segment the "WF" code to represent Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity). |
Add to the existing REF02 of the REF~PRT segment the "WF" code to represent Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity). |
10/22/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 814_22 and 867_03 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 762 |
Discontinue use of the 650_05 response transaction that doesn't provide or require a response by the TDSP once received. |
Discontinue use of the 650_05 response transaction that doesn't provide or require a response by the TDSP once received. |
10/25/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_05 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
Yes |
| 763 |
Ability to allow the MVI to be suspended when the ESIID has a Switch Hold applied for Meter Tampering or Defer Payment agreement. |
Ability to allow the MVI to be suspended when the ESIID has a Switch Hold applied for Meter Tampering or Defer Payment agreement. |
10/25/2010 |
Johnny Robertson |
TXU Energy |
Yes |
814_28 |
Withdrawn |
Future |
Yes |
| 764 |
Add an expiration date to the Special Needs designation to allow CRs to audit these designations and ask TDSPs for clarification of whether a status has been removed if the expiration date has passed without receiving an update. |
Add an expiration date to the Special Needs designation to allow CRs to audit these designations and ask TDSPs for clarification of whether a status has been removed if the expiration date has passed without receiving an update. |
10/27/2010 |
Jennifer Fredrick |
Direct Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 and 814_22 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 765 |
The final rule language for Critical Care adopted the concept that TDSPs are required to provide notice to REPs when a Customer's ESIID is placed on Temporary Status for either Critical Care Residential or Chronic Care Residential. Adding 2 additional codes for the temporary Critical Care status |
The final rule language for Critical Care adopted the concept that TDSPs are required to provide notice to REPs when a Customer's ESIID is placed on Temporary Status for either Critical Care Residential or Chronic Care Residential. Adding 2 additional codes for the temporary Critical Care status |
11/01/2010 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 and 814_22 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 766 |
In order to provide codes that are more specific than "Other" with a text explanation, TX SET shall add a new code T023 to the REF~G7 for Move Out treated as a force off due to Move In scheduled for same date. |
In order to provide codes that are more specific than "Other" with a text explanation, TX SET shall add a new code T023 to the REF~G7 for Move Out treated as a force off due to Move In scheduled for same date. |
10/28/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_28 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 767 |
In order to accommodate the reason for change when updating the expiration date for special needs customers add the REF02 code of the DTM036 to the REF~TD of the LIN loop. |
In order to accommodate the reason for change when updating the expiration date for special needs customers add the REF02 code of the DTM036 to the REF~TD of the LIN loop. |
11/01/2010 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
Texas-New Mexico Power |
No |
814_20 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 768 |
Adding clarifying language into the gray box for Change Control 2010-735 |
This change control is adding clarifying language into the gray box that was approved in Change Control 2010-735 by TX SET on 10/12/10 to know which Switch Hold is required to be notified to the gaining POLR CR in the event of a Mass Transition according to the Tampering Rule |
11/19/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04 and 814_14 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 769 |
Adding clarifying language to the Switch Hold Add & Swith Hold Remove codes for Change Control 2010-737. |
Adding clarifying language to the Switch Hold Add & Swith Hold Remove codes for Change Control 2010-737. |
11/19/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 770 |
New code needed for clarification of Complete Unexecutable situations when the TDSP places a Switch Hold on an ESIID preventing completion of a MVI or Switch. |
New code needed for clarification of Complete Unexecutable situations when the TDSP places a Switch Hold on an ESIID preventing completion of a MVI or Switch. |
11/19/2010 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_28 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 771 |
Clarification of the gray box language further for the REF~1P~HIU code that was modified and approved in Change Control 2010-740 |
Clarification of the gray box language further for the REF~1P~HIU code that was modified and approved in Change Control 2010-740. |
01/24/2011 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
Texas-New Mexico Power |
No |
814_04, 814_05 and 814_27 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 772 |
Modifications to Change Control 2010-753 to remove Electric Vehicles (which was Approved in 2010-754) from the Purpose Code and only applying the new FI012 Purpose Code to Generation devices at the premises. |
Modifications to Change Control 2010-753 to remove Electric Vehicles (which was Approved in 2010-754) from the Purpose Code and only applying the new FI012 Purpose Code to Generation devices at the premises. |
01/24/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 773 |
Clarifications to bring the TX SET Implementation Guides compliant and resolve disparities between Change Control 2010-738 and PUCT Critical Care Form. |
Clarifications to bring the TX SET Implementation Guides compliant and resolve disparities between Change Control 2010-738 and PUCT Critical Care Form. |
01/24/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 774 |
Changes were made to the Critical Care form by the PUCT and subsequently changes are required to Change Control 2010-757 to update the telephone numbers to be non-specific. |
Changes were made to the Critical Care form by the PUCT and subsequently changes are required to Change Control 2010-757 to update the telephone numbers to be non-specific. |
01/24/2011 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
Texas-New Mexico Power |
No |
814_20 |
Withdrawn |
4.0 |
No |
| 775 |
Add grey box to the DC005 purpose code of the 650_01: This code authorizes the TDSP to disconnect service at any location accessible to them, which includes premium disconnect location. |
Add grey box to the DC005 purpose code of the 650_01: This code authorizes the TDSP to disconnect service at any location accessible to them, which includes premium disconnect location. |
02/09/2011 |
Jennifer Frederick |
Direct Energy |
No |
650_01 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 776 |
This Change Control updates the existing 2010-734 Change Control for Switch Hold. This new Change Control breaks out Switch Hold into Switch Hold for Tampering and Switch Hold for Payment Plan. |
This Change Control updates the existing 2010-734 Change Control for Switch Hold. This new change control breaks out Switch Hold into Switch Hold for Tampering and Switch Hold for Payment Plan. |
02/23/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 777 |
Adding new codes in the REF~8X to Add Payment Plan Switch Hold and two removal codes -- (1) for Switch Hold Removal due to Tampering and (1) Switch Hold Removal for Payment Plan Switch Hold at the request of the REP of Record. |
Adding new codes in the REF~8X to Add Payment Plan Switch Hold and two removal codes -- (1) for Switch Hold Removal due to Tampering and (1) Switch Hold Removal for Payment Plan Switch Hold at the request of the REP of Record. |
03/10/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 778 |
This Change Control adds a new code "R" to the existing Change Control 2010-747 for the 814_20 transaction only. Adding the "R" code in the 814_20 will remove the AMSM/AMSR code in the event a meter is replaced with non-AMS meter. |
This Change Control adds a new code "R" to the existing Change Control 2010-747 for the 814_20 transaction only. Adding the "R" code in the 814_20 will remove the AMSM/AMSR code in the event a meter is replaced with non-AMS meter. |
03/11/2011 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 779 |
This Change Control appends to 2010-748 to sync up the transaction names due to being inadvertently left out. |
This Change Control appends to 2010-748 to sync up the transaction names due to being inadvertently left out. |
03/30/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_23 and 814_28 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 780 |
Gray box language added to a new REF segment (REF~SH) notifying a POLR that a Tampering Switch Hold existed prior to the Mass transition. This Change Control replaces 2010-735 and Change Control 2010-768. |
Gray box language added to a new REF segment (REF~SH) notifying a POLR that a Tampering Switch Hold existed prior to the Mass transition. This Change Control replaces 2010-735 and Change Control 2010-768. |
03/31/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_04 and 814_14 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 781 |
The Critical Care Change Controls have been consolidated into this new Change Control. This Change Control replaces 2010-738, 2010-757, 2010-764, 2010-765, 2010-767, 2011-773, and 2011-774. |
The Critical Care Change Controls have been consolidated into this new Change Control. This Change Control replaces 2010-738, 2010-757, 2010-764, 2010-765, 2010-767, 2011-773, and 2011-774. |
03/31/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 and 814_22 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 782 |
Add the "DUP" reject code to be a valid rejection reason in the 650_02 transaction to indicate a duplicate 650_01 was received by the TDSP. Also clarifying DC005 "Disconnect due to tampering" is really a "Disconnect for non-payment of charges associated to Tampering". |
Add new reject code of "DUP" for duplication request received by TDSP in the 650_02 in the REF03 of the REF~7G. Also clarifying DC005 "Disconnect due to tampering" is really a "Disconnect for non-payment of charges associated to Tampering". |
04/27/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 783 |
This Change Control appends to 2010-760 and 2010-761 to add codes for Light Emitting Diode and Wi-Fi to the 867_02 due to being inadvertently left out. |
This Change Control appends to 2010-760 and 2010-761 to add codes for Light Emitting Diode and Wi-Fi to the 867_02 due to being inadvertently left out. |
04/28/2011 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
No |
867_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 784 |
Adding new Cancel Code of CMO "Cancel Move Out" to the 814_08 transaction. |
Adding new Cancel Code of CMO "Cancel Move Out" to the 814_08 transaction. |
05/05/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_08 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 785 |
Add the new reject code of "TCC" to notify all REPs that the TDSP has completed a competing transaction for the same scheduled date. Also add the Complete Unexecutable code "T024" to the REF~G7 segment of the 814_28 and 650_02. Add new code "TDR" for Two Business Days Notification Required in the REF~7G of the 814_13. Adding "SHF" as a valid reject code in the REF~G7 of the 814_11. |
For easier reporting and quicker notification response back to the submitting CR, TX SET created a new reject code of "TCC" "TDSP Completed a Competing Transaction Scheduled for the Same Date" in the REF~7G (Rejection Reason) into all the affected response transactions. |
05/10/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_11, 814_13, 814_25, and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 786 |
Requesting two new SAC04 codes for the Oncor service area. |
Oncor plans to implement the addition of the following 2 new SAC04 codes (SER105 and SER109) for these discretionary charges and suspend using the current line item SAC04 -- SAC15 codes on or after September 1 2011: SER139 Inadvertent Gain Charge SER140 Meter Investigation Charge |
06/01/2011 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
No |
| 787 |
Update the 814_04 REF~IX gray box. REF~IX is not optional when REF~MT = COMBO. |
Update the gray box of the 814_04 transaction to be consistent with the 814_05, 814_14 and 814_22 Implementation Guides and remove the statement that the REF~IX is optional when REF~MT = COMBO. |
07/15/2011 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_04 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 788 |
Clarification in the gray box of the REF~MR segment that only one REF~MR segment will be sent for each transaction. |
Gray box update to show that only 1 REF~MR segment should be sent. |
07/25/2011 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
TNMP |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20, 814_22 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 789 |
This Change Control is to incorporate changes that will be put into place with changes to the Critical Care Form. |
This Change Control is to incorporate changes that will be put into place with changes to the Critical Care Form. |
08/30/2011 |
Jennifer Frederick |
Direct Energy |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20, 814_22 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 790 |
This Change Control is to add clarity to many different segments in various previous Change Controls: PER~PO segment, REF~1P segment and the REF~RAA segment. |
This Change Control is to add clarity to many different segments in various previous Change Controls: PER~PO segment, REF~1P segment and the REF~RAA segment. |
09/02/2011 |
Kathy Schott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_03, 814_16, 814_24, 814_PC, 650_02 and 867_03 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 791 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "MSC054" for RATE CASE EXPENSE SURCHARGE 2. |
Add a new SAC04 "MSC054" with the standard description being "RATE CASE EXPENSE SURCHARGE". Operationally Oncor would provide a SAC15 text description of "38929 RATE CASE SURCHARGE" in 810-02 TDSP invoice transactions after the implementation date of January 1, 2012. |
09/20/2011 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
3.0A |
Yes |
| 792 |
Update the 814_20 guide for Critical Care to no longer require the entire loop to be present when adding or updating Emergency Contact Information |
Changes made to the gray boxes in the guide regarding when and how Critical Care contact information is sent creates a possible reject situation if all the contact information segments are not included. |
09/26/2011 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
TNMP |
No |
814_20 |
Withdrawn |
|
No |
| 793 |
This Change Control will update the "DC005" code of the 650_01 to make the Friday Authorization flag required in any disconnection request relating to nonpayment. |
With TX SET 4.0 the inclusion of a disconnection for nonpayment of tampering charges is being added -- Code approved for that is "DC005". No discussion to include the Friday Authorization flag was made during earlier change controls. The Friday Authorization flag should be required in any disconnection request relating to nonpayment. |
09/28/2011 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor Electric Delivery |
No |
650_01 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 794 |
Make the "Unmetered Service Type" found in the REF~PRT segment "Optional" for the TDSP when the information is available at the time the 814_20 Create transaction is established and communicated to ERCOT. |
Make the "Unmetered Service Type" found in the REF~PRT segment "Optional" for the TDSP when the information is available at the time the 814_20 Create transaction is established and communicated to ERCOT. This would prevent multiple 814_20s from being initiated for an ESI ID Create of an Unmetered Service Type and again following-up with another 814_20 to provide the REF~PRT "Unmetered Service Type" update. |
09/27/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_20 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 795 |
Change control 2011-781 left off the NM102 segment and the NM108 segments which are required for ANSI compliance. The change is to propose that the NM102 should be a C and the NM108 will be an EC. |
Correction to Critical Care Secondary Information - Change control 2011-781 left off the NM102 segment and the NM108 segments which are required for ANSI compliance. The change is to propose that the NM102 should be a C and the NM108 will be an EC. |
10/06/2011 |
Rita Morales |
TXU |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20, 814_22 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 796 |
This change control clarifies that several segments will not be provided in the 810_02 for the new "A5" Meter Tampering Charge invoice that was approved in 2010-755. |
This Change Control clarifies that several segments will not be provided in the 810_02 for the new "A5" Meter Tampering Charge invoice that was approved in 2010-755. This will correct the new "A5" Meter Tampering Charge to be similar to the Late Charge Invoice process. |
10/06/2011 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
810_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 797 |
Update TX SET Example documents to be in line with TX SET 4.0 Implementation Guide changes. |
Update TX SET Example documents to be in line with TX SET 4.0 Implementation Guide changes. |
04/27/2012 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
All example documents |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 798 |
Updating the 814_24 to allow only the CSA CR to submit the REF~2W and create new reject reason for ERCOT |
Clarify gray box language on 814_24 for the REF~2W code. Create new reject reason to be used by ERCOT only when REF~2W is used by a CR that is not the current CSA CR. |
08/24/2012 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
TNMP |
No |
814_24 and 814_25 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 799 |
Clarifies the current description shown in the REF~8X~TE003 of "PCB" Purpose Code to show it as "Investigate Transformer Leaking" in the 650_01 and 650_02. |
Clarifies the current description shown in the REF~8X~TE003 of "PCB" Purpose Code to show it as "Investigate Transformer Leaking" in the 650_01 and 650_02. |
09/27/2012 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint Energy |
No |
650_01 and 650_02 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 800 |
Muni-Coop guidelines are different than the IOU guidelines for meter removal |
When the Muni-Coop issues a 650_04 they pull the meter for a non-pay disconnect. The Muni-Coop will use the S2 action code in the BGN08. The CR's are wanting the Muni-Coop to use the R8 action code so that the CRs system will automatically trigger an 814_24. The Muni-Coop is disconnecting for non-pay and not because the customer called for disconnect, in which case the R8 action code is used. The Muni-Coop would like the CR's to understand that the guidelines are different for Muni-Coops than the IOU guidelines. Recommend adding the following to the S2 gray box "Required for MOU/EC: In order to avoid ongoing liability, a CR must submit an 814_24 to terminate service no earlier than five days after receipt of a 650_04 indicating successful completion of the disconnect for non-payment request." To clarify the use of S2 action code in MOU-EC market. |
08/22/2013 |
Paula Shadle |
Nueces Electric Coop |
No |
650_04 |
Withdrawn |
|
Yes |
| 801 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "OPT001" for AMS Opt Out Monthly Fee |
The "AMS opt out" substantive rule 25.133 has been approved and requires the TDUs to bill the monthly Opt Out fee to the REP of RECORD. This change request is intended to utilize the TX SET agreed process to add SAC04 code(s) into in the SAC04 Codes list.xls for the 810_02 and 810_03 transactions. |
08/22/2013 |
Ed Echols |
Oncor |
Yes |
810_02 and 810_03 |
Implemented |
Future |
No |
| 802 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "PCR001" for Power Cost Recovery Factor |
During the July 17, 2013 STTF reviewed updates to the FAQs document that were drafted by Sharyland Utilities during that discussion the STTF identified a need for a new SAC04 Code that will need to be added to the 810_02 and 810_03 TX SET transactions to uniquely identify the Power Cost Recovery Factor. |
09/04/2013 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
810_02 and 810_03 |
Implemented |
Future |
No |
| 803 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "MSC055" for Surcharge Energy Efficiency |
PUCT Docket 42359, Remand of Docket No. 36952, ET AL - (Application of CenterPoint Houston Electric, LLC to Defer Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery and for Approval of an Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor): |
05/21/2014 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
Future |
No |
| 804 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "MSC056" for Deferred Cost Recovery Charge |
Sharyland is requesting a new SAC04 code with a description of “Deferred Cost Recovery Charge” and identified as “MSC056”. This change will provide Competitive Retailers easier identification of the newly proposed surcharge by utilizing a unique SAC04 and description included in the 810_02 TDSP Invoice to the Competitive Retailers. |
06/01/2016 |
Michael Glass |
Sharyland Utilities, L.P. |
No |
810_02 |
Implemented |
Future |
No |
| 805 |
Update all of the TX SET Implementation Guides to allow the receiver of the transaction containing Special Characters to determine to either accept the transaction or to respond with a valid rejection. |
Update the all TX SET Implementation Guides to allow the receiver of the transaction containing Special Characters to determine to either accept the transaction or to respond with a valid rejection. The structure page of every Implementation Guide will be updated to have the following language. Transaction Set Notes: For use on an alphanumeric field, TX SET recognizes all characters within the Basic Character Set. Within the Extended Character Set, TX SET recognizes all character sets except all Select Language Characters found in Section 3.3.2 item (4) of X12 Application Control Structure. Exceptions to ANSI Standards for alphanumeric fields are noted in gray box of this Implementation Guide. Recipients of a transaction(s) containing characters found in item (4) as referenced above may make the determination to accept the transaction(s) or respond with a valid reject. |
01/09/2017 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
All transactions |
Withdrawn |
|
No |
| 806 |
Sync the Texas SET Implementation Guides with ERCOT Protocols in the way the Muni-Coop is abbreviated. |
The term MCTDSP is not defined in ERCOT Protocols. In order to sync all of the Texas SET Implementation Guides with Protocols, this Change Control is being submitted to update MCTDSP to MOU/EC TDSP. |
02/14/2017 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
650_01, 650_02, 650_04, 810_03, 814_01, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_11, 814_14, 814_16, 814_18, 814_19, 814_24, 814_25, 814_PC, 814_PD, 820_03, 824, 867_03, T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 807 |
Update the language in the CW1 Reject Reason in the 814_09 and 814_13 transaction to support NPRR778 |
This change control updates the language in the CW1 Reject Reason code for the 814_09 and 814_13 transactions to support NPRR778, Modifications to Date Change and Cancellation Evaluation Window. |
07/17/2017 |
Diana Rehfeldt |
TNMP |
No |
814_09 and 814_13 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
Yes |
| 808 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "SER141" for Unmetered Pole Attachment Service Charge |
CNP is requesting a new SAC04 code that uniquely identifies Pole Attachment Service Charge in the 810_02 TDSP Invoice. CNP request an emergency addition of this new SAC04 code SER141 to allow Competitive Retailers (CRs) time to test and implement the new code into their production systems to meet the effective date in this Project’s Final Order. |
08/06/2019 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
4.0 |
No |
| 809 |
Requesting a new Construction Hold Pending Code (CHP) to the 814_04 and 814_05 to help REPs identify the reason for potential delays on a MVI request |
Today, when Oncor receives a MVI for a premise on construction hold, we will send an 814_04 to the market with a scheduled date even though we can’t schedule the MVI yet because of the hold. The construction hold may last 60 days or more. REPs are blind to the construction hold, so often call or send MarkeTraks to try to find out the MVI status. TDSPs could potentially reject the MVI which the REPs may respond to the rejection with a new MVI causing unnecessary truck rolls. |
10/14/2019 |
Sam Pak |
Oncor |
No |
814_04 and 814_05 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 810 |
Clarifies how the TDSP utilize the BGN08 and REF~5H segments within the 650_04 when terminating or suspending service at a premise. |
When a TDSP terminates service and requires the REP of Record to send an 814_24 Move Out transaction, the TDSP will utilize BGN08 = R8 (Terminate). The TDSP will further clarify the reasoning for terminating service by selecting the appropriate Suspension/Reactivation Code within the REF~5H segment. The code provided within the REF~5H segment does not determine whether the CR should send the 814_24. The CR should send an 814_24 Move Out transaction only when the BGN08 = R8 (Terminate). When a TDSP suspends service and does not require an 814_24, the TDSP will utilize BGN08 = S2 (Suspend). The TDSP will further clarify the reasoning for suspending service by selecting the appropriate Suspension/Reactivation Code within the REF~5H segment. Regardless of the code provided within the REF~5H segment, if the CR receives BGN08 = S2, the CR should not send the 814_24. |
02/24/2020 |
Jim Lee |
AEP Texas |
No |
650_04 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 811 |
Administrative updates to the TX SET Guides in order to reflect actual transaction processing. |
Administrative changes to clarify actual TX SET Transaction processing. |
03/12/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
All transactions |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 812 |
Administrative updates to the TX SET 814_20 and 814_21 Guides in order to reflect actual transaction processing. |
Administrative updates to the TX SET Guides in order to reflect actual transaction processing. |
03/30/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_20 and 814_21 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 813 |
Administrative updates to the TX SET 867_02, 867_03 and 867_04 Guides in order to reflect actual transaction processing. |
Administrative updates to the TX SET Guides in order to reflect actual transaction processing. |
03/30/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
867_02, 867_03 and 867_04 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 814 |
Administrative update to the TX SET 814_09 Guide |
Update the 814_09 TX SET Guide to clarify ZIP is for ERCOT use only. |
04/02/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_09 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 815 |
Update the 650_01 Guide as a result of the market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey |
This Change Control includes the changes or clarifications that are the result of market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey Lessons Learned Workshop and several follow-up discussions held during TX SET meetings over the past 18 months: |
04/08/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
650_01 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 816 |
Update the 650_02 Guide as a result of the market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey |
This Change Control includes the changes or clarifications that are the result of market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey Lessons Learned Workshop and several follow-up discussions held during TX SET meetings over the past 18 months: |
04/08/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
650_02 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 817 |
Update the 650_04 Guide as a result of the market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey |
This Change Control includes the following changes or clarifications that are the result of market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey Lessons Learned Workshop and several follow-up discussions held during TX SET meetings over the past 18 months: |
04/08/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
650_04 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 818 |
Update the 814_28 Guide as a result of the market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey |
This Change Control includes the following changes or clarifications that are the result of market recommendations following Hurricane Harvey Lessons Learned Workshop and several follow-up discussions held during TX SET meetings over the past 18 months: |
04/08/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_28 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 819 |
Clarify REF~4P and REF~IX are not provided when NM109 is NONE or UNMETERED in the 814_20 |
Clarification of the use of NONE and ALL in the NM1. Clarification of the use of REF~4P and REF~IX |
04/08/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_20 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 820 |
Recipients of the Select Language Characters (Special Characters) found in the Extended Character Set of the Application Control Structure can be rejected with a 997 Reject. |
The Select Language Characters found in Section 3.3.2 item (4) of X12 Application Control Structure are not considered allowable characters in the Texas SET transactions. This Change Control will add language to all of the Texas SET Transactions to allow the receiver of select language characters to reject the transaction with a 997 reject. |
04/21/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
All transactions |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 821 |
Add necessary data elements to transactions to allow the submission of County to be communicated |
In order to communicate the County an ESIID resides in new data elements must be added to the following transactions 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 |
04/24/2020 |
Kyle Patrick |
NRG |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_20 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 822 |
Update the 814_20 Guide for the REF~4P to clarify the use when NM101 = MX |
“The current logic at ERCOT is validating against the NM101 of MX regardless of the meter type. So, in the case below, even though the NM108 = 93 and the NM101= NONE we were expecting the REF~4P since the NM101 = MX. It is not clear if we should be going by, the NM101 = MX is required or the NM108 = 93 and the NM101= NONE.” |
05/06/2020 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 823 |
Administrative change to the 824 to clarify only one OTI loop per transaction |
Administrative update the 824 to clarify current processing. |
05/11/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
824 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 824 |
Update Texas SET Implementation Guides to restrict N2 and N3 to only allow one per loop. |
Update Texas SET Implementation Guides to restrict N2 (Notification name overflow & Customer Billing Name Overflow) and N3 (Service Address and Customer Billing Address) to only allow one per loop. |
06/17/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_16, 814_20, 814_22, 814_24, 814_28 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 825 |
Modify the 814_20 Implementation Guide to allow the REF~PRT when NM101 equals MQ. |
Modify the 814_20 Implementation Guide to allow the REF~PRT when NM101 equals MQ. |
09/11/2020 |
Jim Lee |
AEP Texas |
Yes |
814_20 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 826 |
Update the 814_25 Guide to allow for the FRB ‘Invalid Billing Type’ Reject Code. |
Update the 814_25 Guide to allow for the FRB ‘Invalid Billing Type’ Reject Code. |
10/05/2020 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
Yes |
814_25 |
Implemented |
4.0A |
No |
| 827 |
Allow Competitive Retailer to provide customer's email to TDSP |
Technological advancements have provided opportunities in delivering services to better serve and inform the customer with proactive power outage notifications and updates. Unfortunately, customers usually aren’t aware of these communication channels and self-serving platforms, and many times contacts the Competitive Retailer for outage information which refers the customer to the TDSP leading to an inefficient customer experience. If upon enrollment of electricity service a customer’s email is provided to the TDSP, then a customer could be made aware of more effective outage alerts. |
11/17/2020 |
Sam Pak |
Oncor |
No |
814_01, 814_03, 814_16 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 828 |
Add DTM Start and End segments to the 814_18 Establish/Delete CSA Request. |
Add DTM Start and End segments to the 814_18 Establish/Delete CSA Request and the 814_19 Establish/Delete CSA Response. |
04/07/2021 |
Kyle Patrick |
NRG |
No |
814_18 and 814_19 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 829 |
Add a new indicator to indicate regain due to Inadvertent Gain/Loss and Right of Rescission |
Add a new indictor for Inadvertent transactions and Right of Rescission transactions. Will be sent by the CR to inform the TDSP that the transaction is being used to reverse a Switch or Move-In due to Inadvertent Gain or Loss or Will be sent by the CR to inform the TDSP that the transaction is being used to reverse a Switch or Move-In due to Customers Right of Rescission |
04/08/2021 |
Jim Lee |
AEP Texas |
No |
814_16, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 830 |
Add additional Reject Codes and Reject Reasons to provide more descriptive rejects |
Texas SET reviewed A13 Rejects that were being sent by both ERCOT and the TDSPs, to determine if there was enough of one type to create a new Reject Code. It was determined to provide more descriptive rejects, Texas SET should add some additional new Reject Codes. |
04/08/2021 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_02, 814_04, 814_05, 814_09, 814_11, 814_13, 814_17, 814_19, 814_21, 814_25, 814_27, 814_29 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 831 |
Add new REF segment in order to provide Meter Service Type |
With the addition of this new REF segment shown as “REF~MSL” that will be defined as: “Metered Service Type List” may be used by the TDSP(s) to provide additional information to the Competitive Retailer(s) to better describe the ESI ID’s Service Type that is being metered. |
04/08/2021 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_22 and 814_20 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 832 |
To support Change Control 2021-829 for Inadvertent Gain/Loss or Customer Rescission this change control adds 3 new rejection reasons |
This Change Control adds two new specific Rejection Reason codes to the REF~7G to both the 814_04, Enrollment Notification Response, and the 814_05, CR Enrollment Notification Response, transactions: Add: New Rejection Reason code: “LFG” – “Leapfrog Scenario – Third Party has gained or in the process of gaining this ESI ID. (Inadvertent Gain/Loss or Customer Rescission Reject)” Add: New Rejection Reason code: “MVO” – “Move-Out is scheduled or has been completed by the TDSP (Inadvertent Gain/Loss or Customer Rescission Reject)” |
06/17/2021 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_04 and 814_05 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 833 |
Add new Reject codes to the 814_19 for support of the new CSA Start and End dates added in Change Control 2021-828 |
ERCOT will require specific reject codes be added to REF~7G of the 814_19 transaction to complete the transactional life cycle: “Backdated CSA End Date”: New Reject Code “BED” “Date Invalid”: New Reject Code “DIV” “CSA Start Date Must Be Current Date or Date in the Future”: New Reject Code “SDC” “Start Date Not Required for 814_18 Delete CSA Request”: New Reject Code “SNR” “Updates the REF~7G “REF03” (Description) to include “DIV” for ERCOT to provide specific invalid date reason. |
06/17/2021 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
814_19 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 834 |
Add specific Unexecutable codes to provide detailed explanations rather than just "T018" for turndowns associated with unapproved Distributed Generation equipment or Auto Transfer Switch and/or no signed Interconnection Agreement received by TDSP |
To provide the Market with a transactional solution for future, CNP is recommending adding additional codes to the 650_01, 650_02, 650_04 and 814_28. See Change Control for a full list of the new codes. |
06/17/2021 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
650_01, 650_02, 650_04 and 814_28 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 835 |
Update code 26 of the BIG07 in the 810_02 to support miscellaneous credits |
The 810_02 graybox states: “A second 810 for the same ESI ID may be sent for a Late Payment Charge, Service Order Charge, Meter Tampering Discretionary Invoice or Interest Credit.” |
09/16/2021 |
Kathy Scott |
Centerpoint |
No |
810_02 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 836 |
This change control will implement logic to reject Texas SET transactions that contain only a comma or other one character punctuation in a name field |
There have been instances where a customer name was submitted containing nothing but a comma in the EDI transaction. Because the Texas SET Guide describes the name field as being free-form Alpha numeric and between 1 and 60 characters, a value of a comma was accepted and passed to downstream market participants. |
09/16/2021 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_08, 814_12, 814_14, 814_16, 814_18, 814_20, 814_22, 814_24, 814_26, 814_28, 814_PC, 650_01 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Future |
No |
| 837 |
Update the 814_25 to remove ERCOT Use Only from the NFI reject code to allow TDSPs to use |
Update the 814_25 to remove ERCOT use Only from the NFI reject code. |
08/15/2022 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_25 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
|
No |
| 838 |
Update the 814_19 to add the ASI02 of 001 (Change) and additional reject codes |
Add the ASI02 of 001 (Change) to the 814_19 Response. Add additional Reject Codes to the 814_19. |
08/26/2022 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_19 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 839 |
Add a new SAC04 code of "MSC057" for Temporary Emergency Electric Energy Facilities (TEEEF) |
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) is requesting a new SAC04 Code be added to the 810_02 TDSP Invoice TX SET transaction will assist Competitive Retailers (CRs) in uniquely identifying this change and also allows CNP with the ability to track and provide specific reporting when necessary. |
09/16/2022 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
Yes |
810_02 |
Implemented |
|
No |
| 840 |
Update the 814_18 and 814_19 Guides to be in line with Texas SET 5.0 Changes |
Update the 814_18 and 814_19 Guides to Add Change to the name. Customer Name and Zip Code Required. |
01/04/2023 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_18 and 814_19 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 841 |
Update the Implementation Guides to support options available to MOU/EC for retail transactions |
Update MOU/EC references to be in line with Retail Market Guide 8.1 |
01/04/2023 |
Catherine Meiners |
ERCOT |
No |
650_01, 650_04, 820_03, 824, 810_03, 814_01, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_16, 814_18, 814_19, 814_24, 814_PC, 814_PD |
Implemented |
4.0A |
Yes |
| 842 |
Update the gray box for the 814_04 and 814_25 for the I2M - Invalid Second Move Out |
Update the gray box for the 814_04 and 814_25 for the I2M - Invalid Second Move Out |
02/08/2023 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_04 and 814_25 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 843 |
To provide better clarification for the use of reject code SOP the reject name and gray box will be updated |
To provide more clarification for the SOP reject, the reject is being updated to the following: SOP reject name - Subsequent Order Processed SOP reject gray box - Rejected Due to Competing Transaction Already Pending, Scheduled or Completed |
04/04/2023 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_09 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 844 |
Remove I2M - Invalid Second Move Out from the 814_04 transaction. |
This Change Control is a correction by deleting the Reject Reason Code of “I2M - Invalid Second Move-Out” including graybox stating “Received Invalid 2MR code” from the 814_04 TX SET transaction that was previously Approved with Change Control 2021-830 (original redline added I2M) and I2M clarified on Change Control 2023-842. |
04/18/2023 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_04 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 845 |
Update the 867_03 to add a new Unique Identifier of "M" (Mobile Generation) into Existing REF~JH (Meter Role) Segment |
Update the 867_03 to add a new Unique Identifier of "M" (Mobile Generation) into Existing REF~JH (Meter Role) Segment |
10/24/2023 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
867_03 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 846 |
Update the 814_04 to clarify the use of PCI and TMI reject codes. |
PCI is not valid on a Move Out transaction. If the LIN07 or LIN09 contains MVO, PCI reject cannot be used. TMI is only valid on a Move In transaction. The LIN07 or LIN09 must contain MVI in order to use the TMI reject. |
12/05/2023 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_04 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
Texas SET 5.0 |
No |
| 847 |
Update TXSETCC827 to require at least one form of communication (Telephone, Cellular, Email) when using the PER~PO (Power Outage Contact Information) |
This Texas SET Change Control, updates TXSETCC827 to add details to the gray box of the PER~PO to require at least one of the communication fields (Telephone, Personal Cellular or Email) when sending the PER~PO. |
01/24/2024 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
814_01 814_03 814_16 |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 848 |
This change control provides clarification by adding gray box language that State or Province Code(s) will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and if applicable digits (0-9). |
To prevent transactional processing delays created when Market Participants’ reject TX SET transactions’ N402 “State or Province Code” populated with lowercase letter(s). |
01/30/2024 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
650_01, 814_01, 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_28, 814_PC T0 Outage Status Request, T1 Trouble Reporting Request, T2 Trouble Report Acknowledgement, T3 Outage Status Response T4 Trouble Completion Report. |
Approved for Texas SET 5.0 |
5.0 |
No |
| 849 |
This change control provides clarification by adding gray box language that State or Province Code(s) will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and if applicable digits (0-9) to additional transactions not included in TXSETCC848. |
This change control provides clarification by adding graybox language that “State or Province Code(s) will only contain uppercase letters (A to Z) and if applicable digits (0-9). Note that punctuation (spaces, dashes, etc.) must be excluded.” to the N402 data elements for the following transactions and N4 segments. |
01/30/2024 |
Kathy Scott |
CenterPoint Energy |
No |
814_01, 814_03, 814_04, 814_05, 814_14, 814_16, 814_20, 814_22, 814_24 |
Approved |
Future |
No |
| 850 |
Update the 824 Guide to reflect current process. ERCOT and CRs send 824 rejects for all 3 types of 867s (867_02, 867_03 or 867_04). |
Update the 824 Guide to reflect current process. |
03/26/2024 |
Kathryn Thurman |
ERCOT |
No |
824 |
Recommended for Approval |
|
No |