From: owner-profilingwg@lists.ercot.com on behalf of lryoung@aep.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:27 AM
To: 1 Profiling WG
Subject: ERCOT PWG: LPGRR Discussion and Weather Responsiveness

There are three (3) issues that I would like to see reviewed at upcoming PWG 
meetings : 

  LPGRR Section 9.2.1  It isn't clear here on what to code as the Profile Type 
  when the tariff changes from BUS to RES or from RES to BUS.   The LPG should 
  help clarify if the Profile Type should be automatically coded as either 
  BUSNODEM/BUSMEDLF ( choose one depending upon whether demand data is being 
  sent to ERCOT or not) when the ESI ID  tariff changes from RES to BUS or if 
  the Profile Type should be automatically coded as RESLOWR when the ESI ID 
  tariff changes from BUS to RES. 
  LPGRR Section 11.5.2 Validation of Weather Sensitivity Code:  Why is this 
  section being deleted from the LPG?  The wording may be elsewhere in the 
  Protocols, but that isn't necessarily a reason to delete it from the LPG.  The 
  purpose of the LPG is to expand on or clarify the wording that is in the 
  Protocols. 
  Weather Responsive BUS ESI IDs:  Is there going to be additional discussion on 
  Weather Responsiveness?


Thank you.