SCR745
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2005 | RMS |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 07/13/2005 | RMS |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 08/10/2005 | RMS |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 08/24/2005 | PWG |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 09/08/2005 | TAC |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 10/06/2005 | TAC |
|
Approved | |
| 10/18/2005 | Board of Directors |
|
Remanded | |
| 11/03/2005 | TAC |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 12/13/2005 | Board of Directors | Board unanimously voted to approve Phases I and II and tabled Phase III. | ||
| 11/09/2005 | RMS |
|
Recommended for Approval | |
| 12/01/2005 | TAC |
|
Recommended for Approval | 12/13/05 BOD |
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result | Against | Abstentions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2005 | RMS | On 6/15/05, RMS unanimously voted to recommend approval of SCR745 with the scope to perform a full evaluation of the retail systems and determine possibilities for resolving and eliminating ERCOT retail system outages. All market segments were present. | Passed | ||
| 07/13/2005 | RMS |
On 7/13/05, RMS voted to expand the scope of the SCR to include recommended solutions. There was one abstention from the Independent REP segment. All market segments were present for the vote. |
Passed | 1 | |
| 08/10/2005 | RMS |
On 08/10/05, RMS voted to recommend approval of SCR 745 and restated that SCR745 should remain a priority of 1.1. The motion passed with one nay vote from the Consumer Group. All Market segments were present. RMS also voted to recommend approval of the impact analysis with one abstention from the Consumer group. All market segments were present. |
Passed | 1 | |
| 08/24/2005 | PWG |
On 08/24/05, PRS concurred with RMS’s recommendation of a priority of 1.1 and a rank of 30. |
Passed | ||
| 09/08/2005 | TAC |
On 09/08/05, TAC voted to recommend approval of SCR745 as recommended by RMS with one opposing vote from the IOU segment; and 8 abstentions from the Municipal (2), Consumers (4), and IPM (2) segments. All market segments were present. |
Passed | 1 | 8 |
| 10/06/2005 | TAC |
On 10/06/05, TAC voted to grant urgent status to SCR745 with one abstention from the Independent Power Marketer (IPM) segment. All market segments were present. |
Passed | 1 | |
| 10/18/2005 | Board of Directors | On 10/18/05, the Board unanimously voted to remand SCR745 to TAC. | |||
| 11/03/2005 | TAC |
On 11/03/05, TAC unanimously voted to remand SCR745 to RMS. All market segments were present. |
|||
| 12/13/2005 | Board of Directors | On 12/13/05, the Board unanimously voted to approve Phases I and II and tabled Phase III. | Passed | ||
| 11/09/2005 | RMS |
On 11/09/05, RMS voted to recommend the approval of two subprojects and a priority of 1.1 and rank of 8 for Subproject One, priority of 1.2 and rank of 58.5 for Subproject Two. The motion passed unanimously. All Market segments were present. |
Passed | ||
| 12/01/2005 | TAC |
On 12/01/05, TAC unanimously voted to recommended approval of two subprojects and a priority of 1.1 and rank of 8 for Subproject One, priority of 1.2 and rank of 58.5 for Subproject Two. All market segments were present. |
Passed | 0 | 0 |
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: | Pending |
| Date Posted: | 05/12/2005 |
| Sponsor: | TXU Electric Delivery |
| Urgent: | Yes |
| Sections: | |
| Description: |
In an effort to promote system reliability for the Retail Market by significantly reducing ERCOT System Outages, a technical resolution is needed. To ensure the technical recommendations in this SCR sufficiently accomplish the intention, ERCOT IT should produced a full evaluation of ERCOT systems, and a full evaluation of internal processes associated with those systems such that Retail Market Participants will be able to select the best cost-based solution able to reduce and/or eliminate ERCOT system outages. |
| Reason: |
To achieve improved Market performance and reliability through a reduction of ERCOT Retail Systems unplanned outages |
-
(05/12/05, .doc, 287.5 KB)
-
(06/22/05, .doc, 316 KB)
-
(06/30/05, .doc, 44.5 KB)
-
(07/15/05, .doc, 318.5 KB)
-
(08/03/05, .doc, 54 KB)
-
(08/26/05, .doc, 324.5 KB)
-
(09/13/05, .doc, 323.5 KB)
-
(09/13/05, .doc, 54.5 KB)
-
(11/09/05, .doc, 328.5 KB)
-
(11/09/05, .doc, 85 KB)
-
(11/09/05, .zip, 91.4 KB)
-
(11/09/05, .doc, 329.5 KB)
-
(11/11/05, .doc, 961.5 KB)
-
(12/06/05, .doc, 942.5 KB)
-
(12/14/05, .doc, 946 KB)