PRR675
| Title: |
Multiple Ramp Rates
|
| Next Group: |
|
| Next Step: |
|
| Status: |
Approved
on 11/14/2006
|
| Date |
Gov Body |
Motion |
Result |
Against |
Abstentions |
|
11/14/2006
|
Board of Directors
|
Approve as recommended by TAC
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
|
10/06/2006
|
TAC
|
Recommend approval of PRR675 as recommended by PRS.
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
|
08/17/2006
|
PRS
|
Recommend approval of this PRR as amended at PRS, with implementation based on the first alternative, as contained in ERCOTā??s presentation, that would not require SPUD changes.
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: |
Approved
|
| Date Posted: |
07/21/2006
|
| Sponsor: |
Coral Power, LLC
|
| Urgent: |
No
|
| Sections: |
4.5.2 Receipt of QSEā??s Balancing Energy Bid Curves; 6.5.2 Balancing Energy Service
|
| Description: |
Revises Sections 4.5.2 and 6.5.2 to allow QSEs to submit a ramp rate curve to ERCOT that would be used to calculate an equivalent ramp rate for clearing the balancing energy market.
|
| Reason: |
Many QSEs in the ERCOT market represent Resources that have multiple ramp rates. The protocols unnecessarily limit QSEs to providing one ramp rate for up balancing and one for down balancing. This limitation may cause QSEs to dampen the overall ramp rate for balancing, which prevents ERCOT from fully deploying the balancing energy that is available from a QSEā??s Resource or fleet. Being able to more accurately submit balancing bids based on actual generation ramp rates would give ERCOT a more realistic picture of a QSEā??s available energy. Being limited to one ramp rate also hinders a QSEā??s ability to pass the SCE metric, because a QSE at times canā??t accurately portray a Resourceā??s generation levels
|
-
(09/18/06, .xls, 145.5 KB)
-
(07/21/06, .doc, 124.5 KB)
-
(08/09/06, .pdf, 569.4 KB)
-
(09/26/06, .doc, 122 KB)
-
(09/19/06, .doc, 54 KB)
-
(09/19/06, .doc, 43.5 KB)
-
(10/11/06, .doc, 123 KB)
-
(11/17/06, .doc, 126 KB)