PRR641
| Title: |
Clarifying RPRS Scheduling Language
|
| Next Group: |
|
| Next Step: |
|
| Status: |
Approved
on 12/13/2005
|
| Date |
Gov Body |
Motion |
Result |
Against |
Abstentions |
|
12/13/2005
|
Board of Directors
|
On 12/13/05 The Board unanimously voted to approve PRR641
|
Passed
|
|
|
|
12/01/2005
|
TAC
|
Recommend approval of PRR641 as submitted by PRS
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: |
Approved
|
| Date Posted: |
10/27/2005
|
| Sponsor: |
BP Energy Company
|
| Urgent: |
Yes
|
| Sections: |
6.7.5
|
| Description: |
Section 6.4.2 (5) states that after a RPRS deployment, a QSE needs to adjust their BES bids based on the LSL and HSL of the deployed unit. Section 6.7.5 (2) states that after a RPRS deployment, a QSE needs to adjust their BES bids based on â??â?¦ the full megawatt quantity of capacity accepted by, and purchased by, ERCOT in the Replacement Reserve market.â?? This PRR would change the language of Section 6.7.5 (2) to match the language of Section 6.4.2 (5).
|
| Reason: |
Section 6.4.2 (5) of the ERCOT Protocols is in conflict with Section 6.7.5 (2) of the ERCOT Protocols.
|
