PRR476
| Title: |
Ramp Rate Adherence During Local Congestion
|
| Next Group: |
|
| Next Step: |
|
| Status: |
Withdrawn
on 08/03/2006
|
| Date |
Gov Body |
Motion |
Result |
Against |
Abstentions |
|
08/03/2006
|
TAC
|
Endorse request for withdrawel of PRR467
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
|
07/20/2006
|
PRS
|
Voted to recommend granting the request for withdrawal of PRR476.
|
Passed
|
0
|
0
|
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: |
Withdrawn
|
| Date Posted: |
11/13/2003
|
| Sponsor: |
Exelon
|
| Urgent: |
Yes
|
| Sections: |
6.7.1.2, 6.10.7
|
| Description: |
Currently, the ramp rates on individual resources are ignored during Local Congestion. This leads to Dispatch Instructions that are impossible to adhere to, especially when every unit running for a QSE is getting a unit specific instruction. Although a QSE may ignore category 4 instructions, they must still follow the category 1. In the event that every unit running for a QSE in a zone is getting a category 4, they all make up the category 1. As a result of the ramp rates being violated, SCE cannot be followed, which puts a strain on frequency which leads to regulation and balancing instructions. Further, the QSE can potentially be penalized with imbalance charges for not keeping SCE at 0.
|
| Reason: |
|
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 67.5 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .xls, 44 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 64 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 84.5 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 45.5 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 86 KB)
-
(09/02/04, .doc, 45 KB)
-
(07/11/06, .doc, 36 KB)
-
(07/25/06, .doc, 84.5 KB)
-
(08/07/06, .doc, 86 KB)